Conference Day 1: Bridge as a Mindsport (1A)

Bridge as a Mindsport in Research, in the Bridge World, in Society

Professor Samantha Punch, Dr Miriam Snellgrove and Zoe Russell (BAMSA)

Bridge: A MindSport for All (BAMSA) is an academic project that explores the social world of bridge and the benefits of mindsport. BAMSA’s research studies relate to social issues including wellbeing, healthy ageing, equality and community. Working with a network of bridge organisations and practitioners, BAMSA researchers translate academic findings into accessible resources for use by the global bridge community. In order to create positive and lasting impact, BAMSA has three key goals: to transform the image of bridge, to encourage more people of all ages to play, and to ensure the card game continues to thrive. 

The BAMSA network is an inclusive and international forum of research associates, practitioners (players, teachers, organisers) and policymakers. The project is led by Samantha Punch, Professor of Sociology, and hosted at the University of Stirling, Scotland. This paper presents the ongoing and future work of Bridge: A MindSport for All and how it links to concerns and issues in the global bridge community. It also discusses how mindsport studies relate to sport studies and leisure studies both in academia and wider society.  

Mind, Body, and/or Confidence? Using Sociological Approaches to Emotion to Understand the Physicality of Bridge

Dr David Scott, Sports Studies, Abertay University; Professor Samantha Punch, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling

The classification of bridge as a sport continues to prove ripe for debate within the philosophy of sport. The emergence of distinctive categorisations such as ‘mind sports’ and ‘esports’ raises important questions as to how they distinguish from more classical categorisations of ‘sports’, and whether such distinctions are even necessary. The concept of ‘physicality’ is often cited as being a prerequisite for an activity to be classed as a ‘sport’, and is typically the given reason for excluding ‘mind sports’ such as bridge from being officially recognised by sporting organisations and funders. However, this paper raises the question as to whether such an exclusion based on ‘physicality’ is accurate. By drawing from data collected through in-depth interviews with elite Bridge players, a sociological approach to emotions is applied to highlight the various ways in which the sensorial experiences of bridge play align with those experienced in sports more traditionally classed as being ‘physical’. For instance, the effects of fatigue, concentration, communication, pressure, anticipation, and physical presence are all noticeable corporeal experiences which allude to a mind/body conceptualisation of physicality, both while at the table and away from it. Of most significance is the importance of ‘confidence’ within competitive bridge and the ways this influences performance. The existential-phenomenologically grounded conceptions of ‘confidence as a frame’ and ‘confidence-through-the-body’ provide insight into the combined sensorial and physical experiences of confidence during competitions. While this paper does not necessarily argue the case for bridge’s inclusion into the wider classification of ‘sport’ on a philosophical basis, it does present a sociologically-informed understanding of how the bridge world could argue the case that playing is more physical than first seems.